Unlike patents and copyrights, trademark licensing carries a unique requirement: the trademark owner must exercise quality control over the goods or services offered by the licensee under the mark. This requirement stems from the fundamental purpose of trademarks - to indicate the source and quality of goods or services to consumers.
A trademark serves as a guarantee of consistent quality to consumers. When consumers see a familiar brand, they expect a certain level of quality based on their past experience. If a trademark owner licenses the mark without controlling quality, consumers may be deceived - they would rely on the trademark as a quality indicator, but the quality might not be what they expect.
This consumer protection rationale is why quality control is mandatory, not optional, in trademark licensing.
The Naked Licensing Doctrine
"Naked licensing" occurs when a trademark owner licenses the mark without maintaining adequate control over the nature and quality of the goods or services. The consequences can be severe:
Elements of Adequate Quality Control
To avoid naked licensing, trademark owners should implement the following quality control measures:
- Written Quality Standards: Clear, documented specifications for products or services
- Approval Rights: Right to approve samples, materials, and marketing before use
- Inspection Rights: Regular inspection of licensee's facilities and products
- Training: Training programs for licensee's staff
- Monitoring: Ongoing monitoring of licensee's compliance
- Enforcement: Right to terminate for quality failures
Section 48(1) provides that a person other than the registered proprietor may be registered as a "registered user" of a trade mark. The registration must be subject to conditions or restrictions that the Registrar may impose.
Importantly, Section 48(2) states that the permitted use of a trade mark shall be deemed to be use by the proprietor, and the use shall not be deemed to be use by a person other than the proprietor for purposes of Section 47 (removal for non-use).
While a US case, Dawn Donut established principles that have influenced quality control requirements globally, including in India:
- A trademark owner must control the nature and quality of goods sold under its mark by licensees
- Without adequate quality control, the trademark no longer serves its purpose of identifying source
- The owner need not personally test every product, but must have systems to ensure quality
- The degree of control required depends on the circumstances of each case