📋 Introduction to GAC

The Grievance Appellate Committee (GAC) was established under the October 2022 Amendment to IT Rules 2021, providing users an appellate forum against decisions of platform Grievance Officers.

Why GAC Was Created

  • Large number of grievances left unaddressed by platforms
  • Unsatisfactory responses from Grievance Officers
  • Need for low-cost, accessible dispute resolution before courts
  • Create culture of platform responsiveness
  • Protect constitutional rights (Articles 14, 19, 21) of users

🏛️ GAC Structure & Composition

AspectDetails
Number of GACsThree committees constituted (January 27, 2023)
CompositionChairperson + 2 whole-time members per GAC
ChairpersonSelected from MeitY, MHA, or MIB (internal)
MembersOne ex-officio + two independent members
Term3 years from date of assumption
NatureVirtual/digital platform — entirely online
Websitegac.gov.in (operational from March 1, 2023)

📊 GAC Statistics (2023-2025)

5,276
Appeals Received (Sep 2025)
5,087
Appeals Disposed
96%
Disposal Rate
1,214
Orders Issued

*Statistics based on publicly available GAC data

📝 Three-Tier Grievance Redressal

1
Tier 1: Platform Grievance Officer
User files complaint with platform's Grievance Officer. GO must acknowledge within 24 hours, resolve within 15 days. For women's dignity/privacy issues: 24-hour action.
2
Tier 2: Grievance Appellate Committee
If unsatisfied with GO decision OR no response within 30 days, appeal to GAC within 30 days. GAC to resolve within 30 days. Digital process via gac.gov.in.
3
Tier 3: Courts
GAC decision can be challenged in court. Right to approach courts directly is preserved — GAC is an alternative, not a mandatory pre-condition.

⚙️ GAC Appeal Process

Step 1: Filing the Appeal

  • Visit gac.gov.in
  • Register/login with valid credentials
  • Fill appeal form with details of:
    • Original complaint to Grievance Officer
    • Platform response (if any)
    • Grounds for appeal
    • Relief sought
  • Upload supporting documents
  • Submit appeal electronically

Step 2: GAC Examination

  • GAC reviews appeal and platform response
  • May seek additional information
  • Entirely online — no physical hearings
  • GAC to "endeavour" to decide within 30 days

Step 3: Decision & Compliance

  • GAC issues digital order
  • Order is binding on the intermediary
  • Platform must comply and report compliance
  • Periodic review of GAC orders published

⏱️ Timelines Summary

StageTimelineRule
GO acknowledgment24 hoursRule 3(2)(a)
GO resolution15 daysRule 3(2)(a)
Women's privacy issues24 hours actionRule 3(2)(b)
Appeal to GACWithin 30 days of GO decision/non-responseRule 3A(2)
GAC disposalEndeavour within 30 daysRule 3A(4)

📋 Types of Grievances

Common issues appealed to GAC include:

  • Account Suspension: Wrongful account blocks/bans
  • Content Removal: Unjustified takedowns
  • Impersonation: Fake accounts not removed
  • Harassment: Inadequate action on complaints
  • Privacy Violations: Intimate images, doxxing
  • Defamation: Defamatory content not removed
  • Copyright: IP infringement complaints
  • Platform Inaction: No response from GO

⚖️ Legal Considerations

⚠️ Constitutional Concerns
Critics argue GAC may lack constitutional foundation — tribunals with adjudicatory powers typically require enabling legislation (per Madras Bar Association case). GAC was created through subordinate legislation (Rules) without explicit statutory backing. Members lack mandatory judicial expertise.
✅ Benefits of GAC
  • Free of cost — no fees for filing
  • Digital-only — accessible from anywhere
  • Quick resolution — 30-day target
  • Creates platform accountability
  • Alternative to expensive litigation
  • Binding orders on platforms

Limitations

  • Only against decisions of Grievance Officers — not original platform actions
  • No enforcement mechanism if platform ignores order
  • Limited transparency on orders and reasoning
  • Potential conflicts with court orders
  • Third parties cannot file appeals (user-only)

📝 Sample Appeal Format